Wednesday, October 28, 2009
"Has Anything...Odd....Ever Happened Here?"
I've heard that question asked before, by a neighbor just before they moved out in the middle of the night, breaking a lease which they had only recently signed. A previous neighbor had also broken lease and left. Now, again, I'm hearing that same question. I even asked it myself when I first moved here. Those first neighbors answered in the negative but still moved to another house very quickly. Then I took a trip to the Nambe Trading Post, a mere stone's throw from where I live, to look at the merchandise and to learn what I could about my house and the area. As fate would have it, it was the owner's grandmother who built these casitas and he used to live in the one in which I have been renting. That one, short conversation would have greater impact on my life than many of the ones which I thought would be life changing. Yet somehow, it was also a validation which I was desperately needing.
I had quite literally moved to New Mexico on a moment's notice. A week prior I had interviewd for a job and was told I needed to move in or near Santa Fe as soon as possible. That Friday my Strictly Platonic Male Friend, Dennis, helped me settle in a motel as Monday I would be starting my new job and hopping on a flight to El Paso for a week of training. That weekend Dennis and I would be looking for a place for me to live. During the week prior, since the interview, I had been on Craig's List looking at properties I could rent. As I had been recently divorced, my credit had taken a hit and I knew I would probably be limited to where I could live. I e-mailed the properties which seemed like they might work and there were some owners who seemed willing to work with me. A woman who owned a little casita in Nambe was the first to respond with some charming photos of her property and didn't seem to take issue with my credit being less than stellar. In fact, she seemed more than eager for me to see this casita as quickly as possible.
That Friday evening Dennis and I drove down from Colorado to Santa Fe. The next day we had seen several properties and the landlady of the casita decided to meet us so we could follow her to see it. Just turn onto the road for Nambe, make another turn right at the little cemetery and just a very short distance later we would be there. By Sunday a check was being written for the deposit and rent on the casita. The grateful landlady, in turn, was being as helpful and charming as anyone could possibly be. That Monday morning I was flying to El Paso and later in the week upon returning to Santa Fe, I was buying a few supplies and a little inflatable mattress on which to sleep as my furniture and cats would not be coming down until sometime later in the month.
Nambe, to say the least, is a lovely and rather historic area. As I was learning, the Nambe Pueblo and lands were just a tiny distance off the property I am renting. Nambe, meaning "people of the rounded earth" has existed there since the 14th Century. The village of Nambe, where I am living, was once an original Spanish Land Grant and many of its descendents still live in their ancestral homes here. Time in New Mexico and especially in Nambe seems to move a bit more slowly. This was something which, in the chaos that had been my life, I was welcoming.
My little rented casita is one of 4 casitas on a smallish plot of land which extends back to a river. Over 100 years old, fully renovated, mine has a high adobe wall and gate enclosing the front porch. High windows give light onto a small loft area. Old cottonwoods line the propety and through them I could glimpse the mountains. There were so many reasons this was the propety where I wanted to live while starting my new life in New Mexico. The hope of stability in a lovely environment was top among them.
That first night I unpacked my few supplies and inflated the mattress. I believe I was in bed about the time it started to get dark, both due to exhaustion from a hectic couple of weeks and because the only lights I had were in the bedroom closets and in another room.
Actual sleep, however, was a different matter.
I kept awakening during the night after the same recurring nightmare: I knew I was on these lands but the casitas were not here. The outline of the landscape and the views still caused me to be certain where I was. It was dusk and I was watching a young Indian man and a much older white man make camp for the night. The Indian appeared to be a recent convert to Christianity. He was holding a long wooden pole with a wooden cross fixed atop it. I remember thinking in the dream that I've always seen these with brass or otherwise golden crosses, never with wood and it struck me as being rather odd. He seemed extremely proud to be holding this cross and was completely transfixed by it. During his concentration, the older man came up from behind him and slit his throat.
It is not my nature to watch extremely graphic movies. There was nothing I had been reading, watching nor discussing which would have put such an idea or an image in my head yet this same nightmare kept playing itself over and over again that first night (and never again after that first night.) Each time I awoke, I wondered why the heck is was so unbelievably cold in my room as it was June, I had no a/c and the windows were closed. I told myself it was simply a cold night in the high desert combined with stress-induced nightmares.
The second night I was even more exhausted from not having slept and having been going full speed since that interview. I was in my little inflatable bed and must have dozed rather quickly. Sometime during the night I awoke due to what was the most ghastly smell I had ever experienced. It was hideous beyond reason - an overpowering stench of something horribly burned or burning mixed with a sickening sweet.... something. As the house was almost empty with only me, a suitcase and some clothes, water and paper goods, I kept telling myself that there is nothing which could be causing such a stench...... AND WHY THE HELL IS IT SO COLD IN HERE?
Somewhere, in the darkness of the front room, I could hear crashes and bangs - sounds which I would have blamed on the cats if they had been here and had things which could be knocked over and broken.
There was absolutely nothing in the other room.
The stench was so unbelievably strong it was to the point where I thought I might actually choke from it. I had decided to turn on the closet lights and leave them on for the remainder of the night. Though the crashes and bangs diminshed, I could now distinctly hear the sound of heavy footsteps running up and down the stairs leading to the loft, along with the sound of movement and running in that loft, directly above my head. Didn't get much sleep that night either. Welcome to my new home.
Within the next few nights I would frequently be awakened by that same, ghastly odor mixed with the sickly sweetness. This often occurred along with the bitter coldness and the sounds of various noises and running in the other room. Other nights, though, there would be nothing unusual whatsoever. Often the stench which awoke me was nothing more than one of the many skunks which seem to use this area as a maternity ward.
By the time Dennis and a friend had moved my furniture down from Colorado, it had been decided that my cats would stay with him until after the move as we didn't want to risk them either getting hurt or lost during this time of transition. By then, I was already starting to talk about the strange happenings at my place. One of the first nights I was finally able to sleep in my real bed it jolted with such a force that I was nearly knocked out of it. Again, I would have tried to blame this on the cats had they been here but realistically it was as if someone had body-slammed the bed. It was also very, very cold but the sickly stench did not occur.
It was during this time I decided to stop at the trading post. I had introduced myself to the owner and mentioned that I had just moved into a place nearby. Upon further discussion, I learned that these casitas had been built by his grandmother and it is part of his family herritage - and that I was actually living in the casita where he had once lived. He mentioned what a nice job the new landlady had done in renovating them. At that point, I could hold back no longer.
"Um, do you know, has anything....odd... ever happened here?"
"Oh yes, your house is haunted."
And with those six words, I had confirmation of what I truly had already known but couldn't make myself admit.
He didn't want to discuss much and had seemed cagey, though he was very nice and somewhat curious when I was discussing where I was living. However, that one question essentially ended the conversation. He did add that it was the casita diagonal from me which REALLY seemed to have the issues. This is the same casita which has never finished being renovated. The casita where no one lives nor has lived in quite some time.
As I was learning from books and my own research, Nambe has this reputation. I would discover that Nambe was known for the number of witches who were known to have lived here. Evil witches. In one case, cannibal witches. I would read about two men from Nambe who were executed for eating small children in order to practice their craft. Another witch was burned alive in her house. Supposedly she had evil dolls hidden throughout the house which came to life and tried to escape. There are many other alleged cases of witchcraft in the village. One book describes Nambe as "the Twilight Zone of the Southwest". Another book I had found shortly after I had moved is called "More Mysteries and Miracles of New Mexico", by Jack Kutz. In it, the very first story is about a divorced woman who moved into an old casita in Nambe, surrounded by old cottonwoods and a high adobe wall. Shortly after moving in, she begins to have strange and frightening occurrances. Though I don't believe the description of her house too closely matches my own, one thing which caught my attention what that she described being plagued by a horrible stench "like something from the depths of hell."
I couldn't have phrased it better myself.
Shortly thereafter Dennis finally came down with my cats and stayed to visit for a while (and I suspect because he knew he would truly miss my cats and their guardian human). About a month had passed since I had moved into the casita and I had only had this conversation with the owner of the trading post a few days prior. As could be expected, he took these stories with more than a few grains of salt. He's never lived it and I do seem to be prone to ending up at places which have paranormal happenings. I have lived in ghost stories in the past. This, however, was something much more powerful and incredibly more frightening.
It was, surprisingly, one afternoon while he was visitng that the overpowering stench came again from out of nowhere. There was no sudden chill and no other odd occurrances, yet Dennis described it as being like the smell of a crematorium. As it was broad daylight, I went outside to investigate but there was absolutely no odor outside. It seemed to simply materialize inside the center of my bedroom and spread throughout the main level of the house. Even with my opened bedroom window, I walked outside to that window and there was no odor while standing next to the screen.
As Dennis would comment, it was the kind of stench which not only seemed to be something we could taste but something which also seemed to leave an almost residue inside our noses until we could not be certain it was even still in the air. Horrifying. Disgusting. But as the months would pass, less frequent. That's the thing about living here. There can be extreme activity lasting anywhere from part of a night to every night for over a month, as well as long periods of absolutely nothing. I seem to think it's like some sort of poltergeist which keeps returning and yet, I sense there is more than one entity, some of which are connected to the casita and others which are connected to the land, both inside and outside.
About 7 weeks ago my cat died. Though he was 17, to me it was still a shock when I took him to the vet and they determined there was nothing more I could do for him. In hysterical tears, I decided to put him down.
I had lost the job for which I had moved to New Mexico back in April, four days before my birthday. I was one of several people who were fired after having been treated very badly by the company for months on end. At this time, another job to which I had applied had been stringing me along for weeks, calling me for a second interview to occur the day after I lost my cat. I had no money, no food and nowhere to go. Being in this kind of shape and quite literally falling apart, Dennis came down to visit and help for a few days. As his car broke down shortly after he arrived, he ended up staying for 3 weeks.
On one of those first, sad nights, he was helping me tidy up my bedroom when he noticed that a bottle of water I had been drinking had sometime in the days prior rolled under the bed. He joked, sarcastically, if I liked storing my water under the bed and asked if I was still planning on drinking it. As the lid had been securely tightened and the water barely touched, I told him I would and he put it on my bedside table.
Later that night I had gone onto bed and was trying desperately to fall asleep, only too aware that I was in pain and extremely restless. I very clearly heard an older woman's nicotine voice ask me sarcastically, "Are you still planning on drinking that water?" Dennis was asleep on the loveseat and I wanted to reply but couldn't. Realistically, I couldn't swear that I wasn't half asleep and that this was therefore a dream though I also must admit while in that state, dreamy voices are anything but clear and that I definitely seemed awake enough to be aware of my physical pain and of how badly I wanted to sleep. I wish I had a voice-activated tape recorder to know for certain if this truly occurred. This had been one of many times I wished I had one.
As is his custom, Dennis was up late one night and decided to work on his car when my neighbor, who also works until late at night, came home from his shift. He started asking Dennis some questions and Dennis thought it would be best for him to ask me.
"Has anything......odd..... ever happend here?"
"Yes, these casitas are haunted."
We discussed what the owner of the trading post had said, what the books said and what happened to me. I told him about coming home at night and seeing my moonlit shadow cast into the grasses - and another shadow belonging to someone or something else appear beside it when no one and nothing was around. I told him about seeing shadowy figures along the trees bordering the property and having rested on the loveseat at night with only my door open, screen door closed and gate locked, only to get up to close and lock the main door after hearing the most ghastly sounds coming from outside. Sounds which even at the time I couldn't describe yet made the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. I told him how I could no longer sleep, even in the summer, with the door or windows open. I also told him about driving home late on a beautiful night during the full moon, the fields and trees so clearly visible from its radiance at these altitudes, only to find that our little cemetery - the one right by our casitas - appeared pitch black in spite of the surrounding light. No rational explanation for why the fields and homes around it would simply glow while it remained absolutely black. For that matter, no rational explanation why my headlights suddenly dimmed while driving past. Ah, almost home. Get inside and lock the door. Again.
The neighbor told me that for 45 days straight, after his baby was born, he and his family would hear the sounds of heavy footsteps right outside their house. They could clearly hear limbs breaking and heavy breathing but never saw another person. They even threw rocks at it but it was no deterrent. Dennis would admit that, on the nights he was working on his car, he also heard sounds from over there but blamed it on livestock, though those neighbors have no livestock and nothing was ever seen.
The neighbor hinted that there were other things too but were not discussed. I was left with the impression that he may have seen something up in my loft. He said he was considering breaking lease and has been home very little since this discussion. A previous neighbor indicated that these incidents were often worse when I wasn't at home (possibly because I would smudge and bless the house when I was aware of activity, it might not have liked that. During one major smudging and uncrossing ritual, that front door slammed shut though there was no breeze). I do know that after I had spent the night at a friend's house in Albuquerque after a long day's visit, I came home the next morning to find my cat hiding under my furniture, crying and terrified.
Was it simply that she was afraid of being home alone now that my other cat died? Did something scare her? Did something hurt her? I won't leave her alone overnight again in this house.
What can be said about all of this? It took some odd experienes for me to look for a job in New Mexico. Some very bad experiences seem to be keeping me here. I'm out of money and need to move, possibly back to Colorado, if there was only some way to do it.
It's seems as though I've had such horrific luck living here but is it really due to Nambe's violent and bloody past, or a haunting, or is it New Mexico being....well... New Mexico? So many people are having a dreadfully hard time now. The haunting may just be a haunting coupled with me needing to blame all of this on something outside of me and yet....
And yet.... So many people have been having these experienes here long before I came onto the scene. Whatever is inside the house seems angry though not, necessarily, hostile. Whatever is outside is another story. Seeing the shadow people, the feeling I had was that I was witnessing something absolutely evil - something which would hurt me if it could. The ghastly noises from outside followed by a chorus of dogs barking and growling only adds to that fear of an unknown and unnamed horror. Somehow, I suspect this land of the 100-year-old adobe and giant cottonwoods knows a secret which it won't, quite, reveal. My time here among them is at an end. It's time to move on now.
Monday, August 31, 2009
Refuting the Birthers, Round 2
So, end of story, right? I mean, any person with half a brain can read this and hang up their greatest delusions about Obama being an illegitimate president?
Not so fast. A new conspiracy has grown trying to debunk the talking points which Koppelman had later used in his article. Specifically, it is trying to refute the points he made regarding Arthur's presidency as well as the actual status of citizenship as decided in The United States v. Wong Kim Ark.
I first learned of this, accidentally, when I was reading an article in the Deadline USA blog in the Guardian. It had an article entitled, Who are the "Birthers", which in turn referenced a poll showing the demographics of the "Birther" movement.
It was due to my response which referenced Koppelman's article that I became aware that a site had sprung up which is entirely dedicated to using half-truths and outright lies to find some way of getting Obama out of the White House. o, let's address the issues at hand:
1. President Arthur wasn't a "natural born citizen".
First, it is true that President Arthur's father was born in Ireland and maintained British/Irish citizenship until Arthur was 14. A gentleman by the name of Arthur Hinman had set about trying to prove Arthur's ineligibility by stating that Arthur was born in Ireland. As anti-Irish and anti-Catholic sentiment was rabid at that time, this ploy to undermine Arthur was very conceivable. When that failed, Hinman then tried to state that Arthur was born in Canada. This attempt also failed.
While Arthur would have appreciated British citizenship due to his father, what had not been decided at that time was if that disqualified Arthur from also being a natural born American citizen:
"Neither the law nor any federal court ruling in the United States has
ever determined whether a natural-born British subject like Chester Arthur can at the same time also be a natural born citizen of the United States, which is one of the constitutional requirements for the offices of President and Vice-President."
Therefore, when Natural Born Citizen claims this:
"He would have known that if anybody found out his father naturalized after he
was born, he could never be President or Vice President."
-- It's a bold-faced lie. The author is projecting what he feels the SCOTUS should decide, not anything regarding what they have already ruled.
It should also be noted that Hinman, for all of his attempts to show that Arthur was born in another country, did not try to prove Arthur had British citizenship due to his father's citizenship. Though Natural Born Citizen seems to think that this was an oversight on Hinman's part, I disagree. At a time when 34 million Europeans had immigrated to the United States and were credited for having helped shape the economy as well as start the Industrial Revolution, it might not have been advantageous for Hinman to try playing against those born in this country to one non-citizen parent. This is probably why Hinman initially tried to focus on Arthur having been born in Ireland. At a time when "No Irish Need Apply" were on signs throughout the country and Irish were considered to be lazy, stupid and ironically both Pagan and Catholic, this would have tapped into people's fears more than questioning their own citizenship status. Hinman did later produce a pamphlet entitled How a British Subject Became President of the United States, it focused on the claims of Arthur's Irish birth and was not successful. It has also been disproved as records show that President Arthur was born in Vermont.
What I find amusing is that both Arthur and Obama had American mothers yet those who wish to denounce Obama seem to think that having any foreign born parent trumps all other factors - in spite of the fact that the SCOTUS has never decided that this is the case. Therefore, I find this attitude a bit of a stretch. Most U.S. laws give citizenship status to a child born oversees if even one parent is an American citizen. As Obama's mother was an American citizen at the time of Obama's birth and as he was born in what was an American state the time, laws tend to consider him a natural born citizen.
It should be noted, lawsuits have been filed against other potential presidential nominees on the same grounds, none of which were successful: Goldwater was born in Arizona before it became a state yet he was considered eligible to become president. McCain was born in the Panama Canal Zone yet there doesn't seem to be a problem there. (Even Colorado senator Michael Bennet was born in India to American parents yet is considered a citizen by birth.) Yes, lawsuits have also been filed against Obama which have also failed.
Most of the laws the "Birthers" love to cite - Obama's mother was too young; was 18 when he was born and therefore not having lived as a "citizen" of this country for at least 5 years after age 16 - only apply to those born outside of the United States. As Obama was born in Hawaii after it had become a state, this is, again, pointless.
2. The Citizenship of Wong Kim Ark.
The case of the United States v. Wong Kim Ark, the SCOTUS based its decision on the 14th Amendment. This was, in turn, based upon English Common Law tradition which excluded two types of people: (1) children born to foreign diplomats and (2) children born to enemy forces engaged in hostile occupation of the country's territory:
"The SCOTUS decided that since none of these conditions applied to Wong's
situation, Wong was a U.S. citizen, regardless of the fact that his parents were
not U.S. citizens (and were, in fact, ineligible ever to become U.S. citizens
because of the Chinese Exclusion Act)."
Again, this defines Wong's citizenship status as a "naturalized" citizen, not as a "natural born citizen" (splitting hairs if you ask me) - but only because the SCOTUS has yet to determine exactly what makes a "natural born citizen".
In addition, the birthers love to leave out one extremely important truth about the Wong decision, which ironically was based on the views of those who dissented and did not want Wong to become eligible for citizenship:
In the view of the minority, excessive reliance on birthplace as the principal
determiner of citizenship would lead to an untenable state of affairs in which
"...the children of foreigners, happening to be born to them while passing
through the country, whether of royal parentage or not, or whether of the Mongolian, Malay or other race, were eligible to the presidency,
while children of our citizens, born abroad, were not".
Therefore, though the the Supreme Court has yet to determine what exactly makes a "natural born citizen", the dissenting voice of the SOTUS wanted to refuse Wong's naturalized citizen status because they felt that being born here would make him eligible to become president. As they clearly stated, they felt it necessary to deny this opportunity to those of certain races who were born here.
Some things never change.
On a final, personal note: The "Birther" movement has only become more rabid and is relying on partial truths and outright lies in order to make its case. If this article means anything to you, please promote it on sites such as "StumbleUpon", Reddit, Digg, Facebook, Twitter and so forth so others may find it.
Wednesday, August 26, 2009
Dumbing Down America One Texan at a Time
Posted by Lee Fang, ThinkProgress at 6:00 AM on August 22,
2009. Students will be expected "to identify
significant conservative advocacy organizations and individuals," like Newt
Gingrich and the Moral Majority.Texas Revising History Textbooks: Liberals Out; Limbaugh, Gingrich, NRA In
The Texas State Board of Education review committee is
preparing to vote on a draft of proposed standards for history textbooks. Noting
that the draft has "nothing
about liberals," the Houston Chronicle reported:
The first draft for
proposed standards in United States History Studies Since Reconstruction says
students should be expected "to identify significant conservative advocacy
organizations and individuals, such as Newt Gingrich, Phyllis Schlafly and the
Moral Majority." [...] Others have proposed adding talk show host Rush Limbaugh
and the National Rifle Association.
The 15-member committee, stacked with10 Republicans, is expected to vote along party lines. Earlier this year, a panel of right-wing "experts" produced a report urging the committee to remove biographies of GeorgeWashington,
Abraham Lincoln, and Stephen F. Austin, César Chávez, and instead add
history about the "motivational role the Bible and the Christian faith played in
the settling of the original colonies."
The Houston Chronicle did include some discussion by the dissenters:
Will it pass muster?
Whether students will also be exposed to liberal examples from the ebb and flow of American politics is hard to predict. Conservatives form the largest bloc on the 15-member State Board of Education, whose partisan makeup is 10 Republicans and five Democrats.
David Bradley, R-Beaumont, one of the conservative leaders, figures the current draft will pass a preliminary vote along party lines “once the napalm and smoke clear the room.”
But not all conservative board members share that view.
“It is hard to believe that a majority of the writing team would approve of such wording,” said Terri Leo, R-Spring. “It's not even a representative selection of the conservative movement, and it is inappropriate.”
Advocate for both sides
Another board conservative, Ken Mercer, R-San Antonio, thinks students should study both sides to “see what the differences are and be able to define those differences.”
He would add James Dobson's Focus on the Family, conservative talk show host Sean Hannity and former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee to the list of conservatives. Others have proposed adding talk show host Rush Limbaugh and the National Rifle Association.
“I think, at the end of the day, we will want the young students to be able to identify what's conservative, what's their advocacy and who are the conservative groups, individuals and leaders. And what is liberal in contrast,” Mercer said.
Among liberals to include, Mercer would nominate the National Education Association, MoveOn.org, Planned Parenthood and the Texas Freedom Network — a group that says it promotes “religious freedom and individual liberties to counter the radical right.”
“We don't think it's appropriate to be listing groups and people in the standards just because they're conservatives or liberals,” said Kathy Miller, the group's president. “The state board should simply stop putting politics ahead of our kids' education and putting teachers in the position of indoctrinating students with political agendas.”
The debate will likely intensify in coming months. Two reviewers have recommended that César Chávez, the late farm workers union leader, be removed from history books because they deem him an unworthy role model.Board members appoint the review committees and typically choose people who share their philosophies.
Of course it should be noted that these implications reach much further than the Texas borders. As Discovery.org noted:
It’s sometimes said by revelers and gamblers that what happens in Las Vegas, stays in Las Vegas. That’s not true of Texas. As one of the country’s major consumers of textbooks, Texas powerfully influences the way educational texts for high school and other students are written. The same critical thinking on science that is being encouraged in that state will also influence students elsewhere in America.
Legislators outside the state are also taking careful note. On the very same day that the final vote was held by the SBOE, news came from Florida of legislation being considered there that would require “a thorough presentation and critical analysis of the scientific theory of evolution.”Clearly, a fire has been lit, small for now, but one that as it spreads, the Darwin lobby will have difficulty smothering entirely.
Wednesday, August 12, 2009
When Newscasters Were Smart and Bombs Were Dumb
You'd think they, of all people, would know which countries we were bombing.

(For source, click here)
I am hoping my fellow StrixFixers know what's wrong with this photo.
Either that or explain to me how Iraq has been bombed so frequently that it decided to jump up and switch places with Egypt.
You know, I've come to expect FAUX News to routinely put a (D) beside Republicans who get caught up in scandals but seriously, this is starting to get embarrassing.
Sunday, August 9, 2009
Surrendering to Republicans
--------------------------
Dear Republicans,
Over the past week, we have seen your passionate protests and heard your concerns about Democratic proposals for health care reform. We have considered your insightful and well reasoned arguments, and on behalf of progressives everywhere, I am here to say: OK! We give up! We are willing to compromise on the proposals that concern you. You've won! Yay!
In accordance with your cogent and potent criticisms, these are the terms of our concession:
1. We will not euthanize your grandmother. This is the big one, and I really hope you guys appreciate how much of a concession this is on behalf of the progressive movement. Since the days of the Bull Moose Party, progressives have wanted nothing more than to slaughter old people by the millions. That much is obvious. After all, if we wanted senior citizens to have long and healthy lives, why would we have created Social Security and Medicare? Think about it. Death to grannies has long been the core of progressive policy, so it's not without some consternation that we give it up. So there: no euthanizing old people. You've got it.
2. Rahm Emanuel's brother will not kill Sarah Palin's baby. While this will require us to gut HR 3200 "America's Health Choices and Murder Sarah Palin's Baby Act of 2009," we're currently working with Henry Waxman to remove the extensive Sarah Palin's baby-killing provisions from the final bill. While this will probably cost us Andrew Sullivan's support, we recognize that this is a necessary sacrifice for securing broad bipartisan support of health care reform.
3. The government will not nationalize hospitals and other health service providers. This is another big one. Though the U.S. Chamber of Commerce has correctly pointed out that current Democratic proposals involve adopting the British health care system, we now recognize that this is not politically viable. The final bill, accordingly, will not involve the nationalization of hospitals and other health service providers. This will be a major setback to Obama's well known communist agenda, but again, we progressives agree with the Blue Dogs that we need to reach a broad national consensus by responding to Republican concerns.
4. We will make the health care reform bill available for all Americans to read as soon as possible. I know that conservatives and pundits have been eagerly anticipating an opportunity to read the final health care reform bill, and after extensive discussion, we have decided to comply with your request. While we would like to have unseen drafts languishing in committee forever, we have asked Senate Democrats like Max Baucus and Kent Conrad to deliver a bill as soon as possible in order to allow the public to read it. As you know, progressives wanted nothing more than to keep these drafts hidden for as long as possible, but in the interests of transparency and bipartisan consensus, we recognize that it's vital to move the legislative process forward. In fact, it is our hope that Baucus and Conrad will return from the August recess early in order to ensure that the public has as much time as possible to inspect their work.
5. We will not subsidize abortions with your hard-earned tax dollars. Despite the fact that both FactCheck.org and Politifact insist that we already made this concession months ago, we're going to make extra-special-super sure that we did. Just give me a second...
...
... yep, we did.
6. We will not allow the government to have direct access to your bank account. I know several conservatives I've spoken to are deeply concerned about this measure, and while we progressives are always looking for new ways for the government to unlawfully violate your privacy and steal your money, we have decided to remove this provision from the final bill. While we may include a way for individuals to voluntarily set up an electronic funds transfer with their insurance provider, we will no longer push for government access to all individual bank accounts. You've won this one.
7. We will not provide illegal immigrants with unlimited free health care. Though progressives want nothing more than to provide unlimited social services to illegal immigrants while denying them to everyone else, we now recognize that this plan was, perhaps, a bit inequitable. However, while they will not be receiving unlimited free health care, each illegal immigrant will still receive a pretty pony. I'm sorry, but we have to draw the line somewhere.
8. Private health insurance will not be eliminated. Though, as Drudge recently pointed out with a damning YouTube video, the long-stated Republican goal of moving away from employer-based coverage somehow means "eliminating private insurance" when Obama talks about the same thing, we've decided to preserve private insurance plans for those who want them. However, we have yet to convince ultra-socialist Charles Krauthammer to drop his communist crusade against employer-based (i.e., according to Drudge, "all private") coverage.
9. You will not be issued a "National Health Insurance ID." While we thought this was a fun idea, the final version of the health care reform bill will not require you to have any kind of ID when you're pulled over for drunk driving or found loitering outside of a military base. In fact, you are hereby encouraged not to carry any proof of insurance whatsoever. Trust me, it's a terrible idea!
10. There will be no super-secret-awesome health care program for ACORN employees. Though we love our election-stealing squirrels, we have decided that they'll have to settle for the same options as everyone else.
With these concessions having been made, I trust that we can now move forward on health care reform with a broad, bipartisan consensus. Blue Dogs and Republicans, you can now rest easy knowing that the concerns of the town hall protesters have been met. While the progressive dream of a nation in which old people are slaughtered to pay for the abortions of ACORN-employed illegal immigrants will again have to be deferred, we are willing to settle for a bill without these measures in the name of bipartisanship.
Congratulations, Republicans. You've won this round
------------------------
Though I will admit to my personal sadness that we will not be giving unlimited free health care to illegal immigrants, I at least can take some comfort that we will be giving each and every one of them a new pretty pony. Speaking on behalf of all liberals who were denied pretty ponies when we were younger, I can assure you there is nothing we like more than living vicariously through an illegal immigrant who makes 35 cents an hour picking fruit.
At least we haven't surrendered HR 4700 "Everyone Must Undergo Mandatory Sex Change Operations While Wearing a Burka Act of 2009"
We must stand up for our core principles.
Friday, August 7, 2009
Employer Provided Fire Insurance
This was a call which took place last Saturday:
Dispatch: Thank you for calling 911, what is your emergency?
Me: My house is on fire.
Dispatch: OK, we'll send someone out as soon as I get the following information from you. May I have your social security number please?
Me: Um, why do I need to give you my social security number?
Dispatch: We need to make certain that you are on a policy which covers your house being put out when it's on fire.
Me: I thought government law dictates that you have to respond to an emergency?
Dispatch: Ma'am, are you still in your burning house?
Me: No, I'm calling from a neighbor's house.
Dispatch: Then we do not consider that an emergency. Your life is not in immediate danger.
Me: But my house is burning down!
Dispatch: You already told us that, ma'am. Try to stay calm and please give us that social security number. If you don't like giving that out over the phone, I can take your policy number along with your employer group number.
Me: I was recently laid off. I know longer have coverage through my employer.
Dispatch: Well, times are hard, especially now that Obama is in office. He's been in power over 6 months and has yet to get the economy up and running again. So, I can take your COBRA information.
Me: As I'm no longer working and drawing an income, I can't afford $800 a month for COBRA. Isn't there anything you can do?
Dispatch: Unfortunately, since you chose not to keep your job or insurance, you cannot demand we put out your burning house. Perhaps you can learn to take some responsiblity for your actions rather than hope the government takes care of it for you.
Me: I do take responsibility for my actions and I normally am employed. I took my first taxable job when I was 14 working with mentally handicapped children and adults. Shouldn't government step up to the plate and help fix the problems that adults and corporations can't fix?
Dispatch: That's socialism ma'am! If you think things are bad now, just wait until Obama pushes through his ObamaFirePlan.
Me: You mean, Obama's plan will be worse than me having my house burn down and losing all of my possessions?
Dispatch: Obama's plan is about killing off the elderly - in house fires. Once his plan is passed, government agents are going to talk to old people and get them to understand how dying in a house fire is good for the economy. Do you want your grandmother to die in a house fire?
Me: Actually, all of my grandparents are dead. My parents are much older than me, though.
Dispatch: So, because you are too selfish and lazy to stay employed and keep your company provided fire insurance, you want the government to fix your problems while your parents die?
Me: I never thought of it like that. I still don't see how getting laid off and being unable to afford $800 a month for a COBRA fire plan means I'm selfish and deserve to have my house burn down.
Dispatch: I don't believe you when you say COBRA will cost you $800 a month. That seems unusually high.
Me: Well, they say I'm a pre-existing.
Dispatch: You mean to tell me that your house has burned before?!!!
Me: No, but they say living along the 285 corridor puts me at higher risk because there have been so many fires in this area in the recent past.
Dispatch: So, you're telling me you CHOOSE to live in a fire-prone area and then want the government to offer a SOCIALISED FIRE DEPARTMENT to put out your fire. Next you'll be telling me you want the government to take care of roads and bridges because you CHOOSE to live an hour away from a major city and can't be bothered paying for that either.
Me: Actually, I think Obama's plan would allow us to CHOOSE whether to keep our company provided fire insurance or go with a government plan. It's called competition. I thought that was a good thing.
Dispatch: It will bankrupt the country!
Me: The funny thing is, if my house burns down and I loose my possessions, it will be that much harder for me to find a job with no home or clothing. I think having lots of homeless, unemployed people who otherwise could work and have their own homes is also very bad for the country. That's why I support Obama's Fire Plan. It just strikes me as being absurd that something as important as putting out a fire is entirely dependent on the companies for whom we work, assuming they even offer Fire Insurance. Many companies don't have the money to offer Fire Insurance. Do their employees deserve to have their homes burn down?
Dispatch: They can get insurance that isn't from their employer.
Me: Often it costs more than what they make in a month!
Disptach: Then they can get better paying jobs, or jobs which offer Fire insurance.
Me: That would kill small businesses who would lose their employees.
Dispatch: So you would rather your taxes go up in order to help people unwilling to help themselves?
Me: If you consider what it cost me to pay for coverage when I had it, plus premiums, deductibles and co-pays, my taxes would have to be higher than what I was earning for it to be more than what I was paying.
Dispatch: So your answer to everything is to have government intervention and force us into a nanny state.
Me: No, I just think the government should offer options to those of us who have none. Sometimes a little government intervention helps its citizens, like when it regulates toxic dumping and prohibits adults from buying cigarettes for minors.
Dispatch: You're opposed to the free market?
Me: Your definition of the Free Market is to prevent competition from offering affordable solutions - kind of like Halliburton saying it supports the free market.
Look, it's been fun. My house is done burning down now but it has spread to a neighbor's barn.
Dispatch: Well hopefully they aren't selfish liberals who think Uncle Sam should pay for their fire to get put out. Christ, next thing you know people like you will be saying the government should pay for the military or police, or should intervene the next time there's a pandemic or hurricaine. Socialized roads will be next, for people to lazy to pay for or build their own roads....
(click)
Dispatch has a point. If only all of the services we take for granted could be determined by what benefits are offered to us by our employers. It would do wonders for government spending even if it means most of us could never leave the house because our employers can't afford road insurance.
Edited to add: please check out this link about the health care debate.
Friday, July 31, 2009
Iraqi Government May Have Colluded in Taking British Hostages
A former high-level Iraqi intelligence operative and a current senior government minister, who has been negotiating directly with the hostage takers, have told the Guardian that the kidnapping of IT specialist Peter Moore and his four bodyguards in 2007 was not a simple snatch by a band of militants but a sophisticated operation, almost certainly with inside help. Only Moore is thought still to be alive.
Witnesses to the extraordinary operation which led to the abductions have also told us that they have been warned by superiors to keep quiet.
"This operation was on a state level, not al-Qaida. Only the state has the capability to carry this out," one of the sources said.
The reason for the kidnapping may have been directly linked to the type of work Moore was doing, installing a new computer tracking system which would have followed billions of dollars of oil and foreign aid money through the ministry of finance.
The possible plot behind the kidnapping appears to be about keeping secret the whereabouts of billions of dollars of embezzled funds.
This system was about to go online at the time of the kidnapping.
The Guardian has also revealed that there was a sixth westerner who was working with Moore and was able to avoid the kidnapping by hiding in a restroom at the Iraqi Ministry of Finance, which is where the kidnappings took place. Accounts from Iraqis, eyewitnesses and a former British military officer allege that the hostage takers all had contacts with the Iraqi government. In addition, officials in the Ministry of Defence warned off witnesses to the kidnapping.
Last month two of bodies of the British security guards were handed over. Gordon Brown has stated that the other two guards were "very likely" to be dead.
A senior intelligence source stated: "Many people don't want a high level of corruption to be revealed. Remember this is the information technology centre [at the ministry of finance], this is the place where all the money to do with Iraq and all Iraq's financial matters are housed."
A Foreign Office spokesman told the Guardian:
"This is a highly complex and challenging case, illustrated by the scale of the original abduction. There has been widespread speculation in Iraq about many aspects of the case.
"We have never ruled out the possibility that the hostage takers may have received advance notice or other assistance from sympathisers who were aware of the hostages' visit to the ministry that day. But since the beginning we have worked closely with Iraqi counterparts at all levels that we can trust, including the police, and continue to have excellent co-operation with them."



